If the earth was truly solid, as the lying mass media and scientists would have you believe, then it would weigh far more than our moon does. Scientifically speaking, this extra weight of a solid earth would increase the earth's gravitational pull and would PULL THE MOON INTO THE EARTH'S ORBIT, SENDING IT CRASHING INTO THE PACIFIC OCEAN!
Anybody with half a brain and a calculator has the ability to do these calculations. The only way that the moon can actually sit in the orbit it is currently in is for the earth to weigh less. By being hollow the earth weighs exactly the right amount to 1) keep the moon in orbit around it without 2) pulling the moon into the earth's orbit.
Don't believe me? The Vredefort impact crater was created TWO BILLION years ago. REAL SCIENTISTS theorise that in the past (more than two billion years ago - NOT A COINCIDENCE!) the earth had TWO moons in orbit (there is evidence for this such as primitive drawings on cave walls of two moons). Don't believe me that this is possible? Jupiter has AT LEAST 63 moons, so it is certainly possible to have more than one moon.
By looking at the massive size of the crater (nearly 200 miles in diametre!) it is clear that the only object big enough to create such a massive scar on the earth's face is a moon and not an asteroid as the phoney scientists would have you believe (no asteroid could do such damage!).
If you are confused right now, don't worry; this will soon make sense.
There is a process known as intra-erosion. Basically it is a process whereby chemical elements within a structure eat away at itself. Ever bitten into an apple only to find that under the skin there is very little actual apple? That is a simple and truthful example.
Two billion years ago the earth began its own process of intra-erosion (don't believe this either? It is backed up by fossil evidence). This process eroded the insides of the earth (hollowing it out) which obviously decreased the weight and mass of the earth. HENCE why the earth didn't have the GRAVITATIONAL PULL needed to keep the second moon in orbit. The moon came flying into the earth and created the Vredefort crater.
All these facts are completely verifiable with simple research, yet many scientists remain silent about these events. Why? That is another story for another blog, so stay tuned.
STAY BRAVE AND TRUE,
GOD BLESS
6 comments:
Please post these simple calculations
Nowhere did I make any mention of "simple calculations" you liar; I did mention "simple research" though. And indeed the research is contained within the blog you have responded to. What, exactly, don't you understand? The facts are staring you in the face! Are you so blind as to not see them? Even Milhouse Franklin had to believe his own eyes when he saw the T-Rex fossil, why is your relationship between sight and brain any different?
Stay brave and true.
Well, I've done the calculations and you are simply and unequivocally wrong. The mass of the earth is over 80 times that of the moon, and is also significantly more dense, which would not be the case if the earth was hollow. The moon orbits the earth every 27.3 days at a distance of approximately 240,000 miles. The apparent 29.5 day lunar cycle is caused by the earth's movement around the sun, which I assume you don't dispute. These values work out mathematically using orbital mechanics derived using newtonian physics. Since I seriously doubt that Newton was involved in a conspiracy regarding a hollow earth, I must arrive at the only reasonable conclusion which is that the earth is NOT hollow. I look forward to a reasoned, fact-based response.
Thank you for the response, but I am afraid YOU are the one who is wrong, my dear, dear Mr Watson. Let me ask a question, shall I? You use weights and other figures to back up your wild claims, but where did you get these numbers? Certainly you didn't weigh the earth yourself on a massive scales? Of course not, so how do you know these numbers are real? Honestly, tell me.
Do you just blindly believe what your science text-books tell you? How could you possibly claim to know these numbers are true? If there wasn't a second moon how do you explain the Vredefort crater? It is too big for a simple asteroid, real scientists agree. But, then again, you obviously don't care about actual science and only in what the Zionist-run government-sponsored scientists tell you.
Take off your blind fold and ask yourself how you know what you are told is true? Answer: you don't!
Stay brave and true.
I absolutely KNOW these numbers to be true, since every single man-made satellite in orbit right now is based on these very same numbers! The math is quite simple to show that the value for GM (the Gravitational constant X the mass of the earth) works for all orbital bodies simply by calculating the distance an orbital body travels in the time span of one orbit. This resolves to a velocity, which exactly matches the velocity predicted by Newton's Law of Gravity. For the earth to be hollow and still have the mass required to hold the moon in orbit, the density of the earth would have to be unreasonably high. Since the density of basalt is only 3 gm/cc (a major component of the mantle), and the average density of the SOLID earth is 5.5 gm/cc, it staggers the imagination as to what the density of a hollow earth would have to be. Depending on the thickness of the "shell" of the hollow earth, the average density could easily surpass that of gold which at 19.3 gm/cc is the most dense naturally occurring material. The size of the earth is well known, and simply calculating the volume and applying a reasonable density yields the mass.
I'm afraid that you have either been deluded by others, or have deluded yourself into a position that does not stand up to the rigors of ACTUAL science. Also, I don't see how "Zionists" or anyone else for that matter even begins to benefit from concealing something that could so easily be proven if it were true. (Which it isn't).
If I were you and still wanted to rant,I would pick a topic that isn't so easy to utterly destroy with logic and facts.
You write:
"Scientifically speaking, this extra weight of a solid earth would increase the earth's gravitational pull and would PULL THE MOON INTO THE EARTH'S ORBIT, SENDING IT CRASHING INTO THE PACIFIC OCEAN!"
But then you say that when the center of the Earth eroded away its gravitational pull lessened and the second moon crashed into the Earth.
Wouldn't the second moon have floated away?
You can't have it both ways.
Sorry. You fail.
Post a Comment